Cursor is the default co-pilot for most builders we meet. It’s fast, context-aware, and wildly capable. It’s also the reason so many large AI-built apps land in triage. Put Cursor on a 50,000-line repo with no boundaries and it acts like an excited junior engineer: eager to help, unaware of consequences.
Here’s the hardened workflow we recommend when Cursor keeps “fixing” the wrong files.
The Pattern: Change A, Break B #
- You ask Cursor to update onboarding copy.
- Cursor scans your React tree, updates prop names “for consistency,” and rewrites the analytics hook.
- Checkout fails because the analytics hook now emits a different event name.
Repeat this a dozen times and you’re convinced Cursor is sabotaging you. In reality, it’s doing exactly what you asked—just without constraints.
Why Cursor Does This (for Large Projects) #
- Full-project visibility: Cursor indexes your entire repo. When it receives a prompt, it proactively aligns related files.
- Heuristic refactors: It optimizes patterns (renaming variables, extracting functions) even if you only asked for a small change.
- Lack of "do-not-touch" markers: Unless you specify safe zones, Cursor assumes everything is fair game.
- Prompts without exit criteria: "Make sure this works" invites the model to chase ripple effects indefinitely.
🎯 Give Cursor Complete Project Understanding
Giga automatically generates context rules so Cursor understands your entire codebase structure. Stop unexpected file changes and breaks.
Try Giga →Step 1: Install Guardrails in Cursor #
1. Define Workspace Rules #
In .cursorrules (or the Workspace Prompt), add:
You may only modify the following paths unless explicitly instructed otherwise:
- app/(marketing)/**
- app/api/onboarding/**
If you believe another path must change, stop and ask.
Keep the list tight. Expand only when necessary.
2. Label No-Go Zones #
Add code comments like:
// 🚫 DO NOT MODIFY: Critical billing logic. Ask before touching.Cursor respects explicit language. Make it loud.
3. Limit Diff Radius #
Use Cursor’s settings to cap maximum file changes per diff. If a change requires more files, break it into separate prompts.
Step 2: Change How You Prompt #
1. Scope Before You Code #
Prompt template:
Step 1: Describe the current behavior of <component>.
Step 2: List the files you expect to touch.
Step 3: Wait for confirmation before writing code.
This forces Cursor to verbalize intent. You approve or redirect before any diff exists.
2. Demand Post-Change Reports #
After a diff, ask:
Summarize exactly what changed, file by file. Mention tests updated and implications.
Compare the summary to the diff. Anything unexpected? Reject.
3. Scripted Smoke Tests #
Require Cursor to update scripts/run-smoke.ts whenever it edits critical flows. If it claims tests pass, ask for the command output.
Step 3: Restructure Your Repo for Cursor-Friendliness #
1. Decouple Modules #
Split monolithic directories into bounded contexts. Cursor is less likely to drift if React, API routes, workers, and prompts live in clearly separated folders.
2. Introduce Public Interfaces #
Wrap critical logic behind exported functions. Cursor will respect module boundaries if public APIs are obvious and well-documented.
3. Document Contracts #
Add README files per domain explaining invariants. Cursor often leaves these alone when they’re explicit.
Step 4: Automate Drift Detection #
- Git Hooks: Fail commits that touch banned directories without a
#cursor-approvedtag. - CI Scripts: Compare file lists between prompts and diffs.
- Observability: Trigger alerts when key metrics change unexpectedly after a merge.
Step 5: Blend Cursor with Human Oversight #
- Schedule weekly “Cursor Review” sessions to analyze where it helped or hurt.
- Pair Cursor with Claude or ChatGPT to cross-check diff reasoning.
- Keep a changelog of major guardrail updates.
Workarounds Founders Use (and Whether They Work) #
| Workaround | What It Helps | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Copying files to a scratch repo | Limits blast radius | Drift reappears when merging back |
| Freezing entire directories | Prevents unwanted edits | Slows progress if overused |
| Switching tools | Fresh model biases | Tool-hopping without guardrails burns time |
The best solution isn’t abandoning Cursor; it’s taming it.
The Automated Approach: Use Giga #
Instead of manually maintaining workspace rules and documentation, Giga automatically:
- Generates project-specific context rules that update as you code
- Creates persistent AI memory of your codebase structure
- Helps Cursor understand which files connect to which features
- Prevents cascade failures from changes spreading unexpectedly
- Works with Cursor, VSCode, Claude Code, and other AI tools
Setup (5 minutes):
npm install -g giga-cli
giga init
giga connect cursorWhat changes:
- Cursor understands your full project architecture
- AI changes only the files relevant to your request
- No more surprise breaks in unrelated features
- Self-learning memory improves over time
Keep Cursor on Your Side #
Manual approach: Ship context documentation and READMEs so Cursor knows the architecture.
Automated approach: Use Giga to maintain complete project understanding automatically.
Either way, track prompt changes in version control and let automated tests catch regressions.
🚀 Stop Cursor From Breaking Working Code
Giga gives Cursor persistent understanding of your entire codebase. Install in 5 minutes and ship without surprise regressions.
Try Giga →Once Cursor has complete project visibility (whether through manual rules or Giga), it becomes incredibly powerful. You'll ship faster and stay in control.
